Day 32 of 2022 baseball books: The Year of the Kaat

“Good as Gold: My Eight Decades in Baseball”

The author:
Jim Kaat
With Douglas Lyons

The publishing info:
Triumph Books
304 pages
$28
Released April 19, 2022

The links:
The publishers website
The Baseball Hall of Fame website
At Bookshop.org
At Indiebound.org
At Powells.com
At Vromans.com
At TheLastBookStoreLA
At PagesABookstore.com
At Amazon.com
At BarnesAndNoble.com

The review in 90 feet or less

Six decades into his life — four as an MLB player and coach, two as a broadcaster — Jim Kaat paused after the 2002 baseball season to write what he may have thought was the first and only autobiography he’d need or want to have published — “Still Pitching: Musing From the Mound and the Microphone,” for Triumph Books, released in April, ’03 (with Phil Pepe).

In the acknowledgements, Kaat was wise to include the contents of a note his son had recently sent him. In it, Jim Jr. acknowledged his dad’s final year of Hall of Fame eligibility had come and quietly passed the previous winter — with still no Cooperstown induction. At least he got 26.2 percent of the Baseball Writers Association of America’s vote in his last year (11th place, between Steve Garvey and Tommy John, and ahead of future Hall of Fame inductees Jack Morris and Alan Trammel). That total was a jump from the 19.5 he got in his first year of eligibility in 1989.

Wrote Jim Jr.:

“I just want to take a moment to congratulate you on your 130 writer votes. I know it does not matter to you and you never expressed a real concern, but if it means anything to you, you will always be a Hall of Famer in my book.

“And one other thing, Dad, I want you to remember that scene from ‘The Natural.’ Roy Hobbs, played by Robert Redford, asks Max Mercy, a New York sportswriter played by Robert Duvall, ‘Did you ever play the game, Max?’ His answer: ‘No, I never did. But I am here to protect the game.’ And Roy says, ‘Whose game, Max?’ And after an awkward pause, Max says: ‘Either way, Roy, hero or goat, you are going to make me a great story.’ And I say this to you because in the future when your peers on the Veterans Committee vote you into the Hall of Fame, that will be the true measure of your success. Because in the end, writers write — that is all they do well — and players play and there is no higher accomplishment than the respect from your peers. I love you, Dad.”

Well, guess what happened about 20 years later …

Kaat, along with Minnie Minoso, Gil Hodges and Tony Oliva, gathered enough votes by the Golden Days Era Committee (looking at players from the 1950-1969 era) and squeezed into the Baseball Hall of Fame’s Class of 2022 for ceremonies conducted this afternoon.

Kaat needed 12 of the 16 voters’ approval to get to 75 percent — and got exactly that (as did Hodges and Olivia)

His second autobio was actually ready to roll before that. Back in November, 2021, when some of the baseball-related books scheduled to come out this spring were posted on websites, note the tentative cover. So with that, Team Kaat could update the cover plate, and do so in plenty of time to coincide with his formal Hall pass in Cooperstown, N.Y.

So what changed? Peer pressure and perspective? Stats and stories? His consistent presence in the game as a broadcaster? Probably all that and more.

Kaat’s baseball card number obviously hadn’t changed — 25 MLB seasons, starting in 1959 when he was 20 and played for the original Washington Senators franchise. Trips through the Chicago White Sox, Philadelphia and the New York Yankees, then winding down in fan-friendly St. Louis for ages 42, 43 and 44 (and finally on a World Series title team) when it all wrapped up in 1983.

(And now that we’ve become interested in such things about a player’s “last time out,” we see Kaat came in the eight inning, gave up a single to Dave Parker and then finished off Joaquin Andujar’s 13-6 win at Pittsburgh on July 1 with a 1-2-3.)

In 2021, Kaat still had 283 wins in 898 games, 180 complete games, 31 shutouts, and 4,500-plus innings to record 2,461 strike outs. A career WAR of 50.5 — which didn’t exist as as a measuring stick back then — was nothing to snort at.

A Game 7 matchup against Sandy Koufax in the ’65 World Series gave him a sizeable spotlight at the height of his career. Kaat defeated Koufax in Game 2 at Minnesota, 5-1, where Kaat drove in two runs with an eight-inning single. Koufax’s four-hit shutout defeated Kaat in Game 5 at Dodger Stadium, 7-0.

(Original Caption) Closeups of Jim Kaat of the Minnesota Twins pitching in the fifth game of the World Series. The Twins ultimately lost the game 7-0.

Kaat could have had another Series appearance: On the last Saturday of the ’67 season, he went to the mound against the Red Sox at Fenway Park. The Twins were one win from wrapping up the AL pennant. Minnesota was up 1-0 in the third when Kaat came out with an elbow injury. The Red Sox won, then took the pennant on Sunday.

Three All-Star selections, three 20-win seasons, including leading the AL with 25 in 1966, where he had 41 starts, 19 complete games and 304 2/3 innings.

But here’s the catch: What seemed to separate him – and put him into a Greg Maddux-type conversation for comparison’s sake – was 16 Gold Glove awards. His abbreviated whip-it-up-there windup put him in perfect position to be an extra defender.

Even in 1969, when he had eight errors and a career-low .826 fielding percentage, he still won a Gold Glove, following the previous six seasons and continuing what would be seven more in a row.

As Baseball-Reference.com points out, there are a few ways of sizing up his stats that don’t measure up to an “average HOFer.”

The “average” Hall of Fame pitcher – which seems to be an oxymoron — has a 73.0 career WAR. But something called the “Hall of Fame Monitor” very much (lately) played in his favor – his was 130, with a “likely HOFer” was pulling about 100.

This ball signed by Jim Kaat acknowledging “Mickey Mantle hit 7 HRs off of me — all solo HRs” is on eBay.com for about $250.

That stat is a creation of Bill James and attempts to assess how likely an active player might be to making the Hall. A 130 is called a “virtual clinch.” It’s based on a point system James assigned to various statistical plateaus and honors reached during individual seasons as well as career totals. Kaat racks up most of his calculated numbers with career games (30 points), career wins (25 points, at being above 275), 15-or-more win seasons (36 total points) and one each for the Gold Gloves. Even though he was fifth in the AL MVP voting in 1966 and the only pitcher in the top five with his 25-13 record and 2.75 ERA with 304 2/3 innings, there was only one Cy Young Award given out at that time. That season, it went unanimously to Sandy Koufax (27-9, 1.73 ERA, 317 strikeouts). The next year, 1967, they finally gave one in each league.

An AL Cy in ’66 would have given Kaat five more total points.

It is undoubtedly a career accumulation that gets it done in a Don Sutton-esque fashion, and a body of voters who understand that.

But don’t overlook the decades in between when Kaat has been one of the most concise, sensible and knowledge TV broadcasters in the game, helping keep his voice in play as well as his “brand,” to a point where the game could give him added validaity had it only went the extra yard to induct him into the Hall as a player.

At age 83, with more than 50 years associated with the game, it has finally happened, and James Lee Kaat is here to experience it.

Jim Kaat speaks to the media in Cooperstown on Saturday, July 23 prior to his Sunday Hall of Fame induction.

And how does any of that figure in the context of this new book? It keeps Kaat’s consistent, congruent and clear-and-present-danger commentary relevant as today’s game continues to try to figure out what it’s trying to accomplish.

Amazon offers a $35 Kindle edition of four of David Halberstam’s most important sports-related titles. In our book, “Breaks of the Game” on the 1977 Portland TrailBlazers belongs in this company.

In that 2003 autobiography, esteemed journalist David Halberstam wrote an introduction and included a story about how he had been listening to a Yankees broadcast and couldn’t help but be captured by what he heard:

“At a certain point it struck me: Even though I am a lifelong baseball fan, there is still much for me to learn about the game. … It was great fun and listening to Jim Kaat gradually pulled me away from my work. After a few weeks, I wrote in an ESPN column that, in what was a damaged year in baseball, one in which the treat of a strike hung over most of the season, Kaat was my hero because he seemed to reflect what the game is all about. Gradually it struck me that I was listening to one of the best broadcasters I’d ever heard.”

In that July 2002 column Halberstam references, he also wrote: “One of my great pleasures has been a surprising one — the simple delight I take in listening to Jim Kaat, as he broadcasts the Yankee games. Quietly with no blather and bombast, he gives what is one of the most enjoyable and thoughtful ongoing seminars on pitching I’ve ever heard. Jim Kaat, you’re right up there for my MVP.”

Kaat already had the credibility as an observer of the game decades ago. But the game has changed much over the last 20 years, and consider this an important and viable refresh with much more circumstances to examine and help give us more to consider, whether on social media or, at last, in book form.

With Bob Costas often as his wingman on national MLB Network or TBS broadcasts — Kaat “retired” after the 2006 season from the Yankees’ YES Network but was likely forced out — Kaat’s conversations are in the same ballpark as what we enjoyed hearing a contemporary, Al Downing, when he was with the Dodgers as part of their broadcasting team many years ago. Speaking from experience on how the game was once played and how it presents itself today, one could argue it’s neither better nor worse, but just different.

In an easy-to-get-through chapters and presentations, Kaat will get his points across in a polite discourse — mostly in Chapter 6 — where he’ll comment on things such as:

Released in 2009.

== The game’s best time period: “I would have loved to have played in the era right after the players came back from World War II. There were just 16 teams. You played each team 22 times and traveled by train. I love train travel. That was baseball’s golden era for me: 1946-1957. When the Dodgers moved to Los Angeles and the Giants moved to San Francisco in 1958, Western civilization began to go downhill. Not really. THat’s just the voice of an old dinosaur who loved the hit-and-run, lead-off triples, squeeze plays and pitchers who could field their positions like Bobby Shantz.”

== Today’s players: “I’m happy whenever the Dodgers catcher Will Smith gets a big hit. He had no chains, beard or visible tattoos. He’s my kind of young man.”

== The 2020 and ’21 seasons: “Sixty games (in ’20, and a Dodgers World Series title)? That’s like playing 40 holes at the Masters and celebrating like you actually won it. Not legitimate. It should have been started earlier so they could have played at least 100 games. Stubborn leadership on both sides prevented that from happening. There were some disappointing parts of the 2021 season. With the friendly atmosphere on the field between players, some games looked like they’re intrasquad practice games. … and nine no-hitters! The influence of science is evident. With overthinking and input from the dugout the analytics department, the games lack a rhythm. … The game needs a more positive vibe.”

== Analytics: “Oh, how I wish those analytic people would have been working for the Los Angeles Dodgers in Game Seven of the 1965 World Series! We had a couple of men on base, and Sandy Koufax was going through the batting order for the third time. He worked out of the jam and shut us out 2-0. That was the last seven-game World Series where every win was a complete-game win.”

(Make the time to enjoy NBC’s beautifully restored black-and-white coverage of that game with Vin Scully and Ray Scott on the call:)

== Alex Rodriguez and steroid use: In context, Kaat documents an odd exchange he once had as a Yankees broadcaster and had to comment about Alex Rodriguez’s inability to push across runners in late-inning situations. ARod didn’t appreciate it and they had a talk, and “we have been fine ever since, though I don’t think it’s right that he gets all the exposure he does on TV and was even a candidate to buy the Mets. If I was commissioner, he would have been banned for life after his second offense. He is a well-mannered but insecure individual who seems to crave attention.”

Right on target as usual. He said as much in a 2014 blog post: “I have a question for Commissioner Selig as he heads into retirement. Why is Alex Rodriguez still allowed to play baseball and Pete Rose is serving a lifetime suspension? I don’t agree with what Pete did and I wish he had been remorseful. He didn’t admit he made a mistake and that hurt him. But Alex has not been overly remorseful, if remorseful at all. Unfortunately, his Hall of Fame numbers and talent will not be how he is defined. I think he will be remembered as the most selfish, arrogant, and self-centered player in history. Maybe a compromise since he wasn’t banned for life a couple years ago, which I certainly think he should have been. Start a fund for former players who are indigent, ill and/or have not much quality of life. Maybe name it the Alex Rodriguez I Wish I Had Been More Humble, Honest and Respectful of the Integrity of the Game Fund. Just a thought.”

Ultimately, the game has become something he doesn’t connect to as well as he once did, and it’s a fact that he could be done with it.

On page 199: “Tony Kubek … passed his job as the analyst on the MSG Network on to me because he lost interest in the way the game was being played and operated. I’m afraid my day of feeling that way is coming. I hope the way it is operated and played attracts a lot of new young fans. But it is far from its original concept of watching a couple of hours of action on a warm spring or summer afternoon where it was quite enough to hear the ball hit the bat sitting in the stands. I’m 83 as I write this. I am concerned about the game appealing to young fans in the years to come. I hope I’m wrong.”

So do we. And this is the right place to express that opinion.

How it goes in the scorebook

This is a fitting calling card for “Kitty” Kaat to have with him in Cooperstown.

Yet, deep down, we all know it a bronze plaque amidst the game’s immortals could hardly measure up to this … glass vase? — he recently received from the New York Yankees.

In late June, Kaat was made to stand near home plate and hold the New York Yankees’ Lifetime Achievement Award.

Why? Why not. But it comes perhaps with some shade thrown in.

During a Yankees-Twins telecast on MLB Network earlier in June, Kaat had been talking up Yankees pitcher Nestor Cortes ability to mow down hitters. “Nestor The Molester” was the phrase Kaat decided to use in describing Cortes’ nastiness.

The blowback was … notable in these days of social media shaming and all that involves. Kaat apologized. Cortes said he wasn’t offended.

And when it was decided by someone in the Yankees front office (George Costanza?) that Kaat needed some sort of public atonement with a dubious recognition that sounds like things the former president gave out to his friends like pardon, and they had run out of room in Monument Park, the team had Cortes present it to Kaat prior to a game he did with Costas for MLB Network.

Because, after all, Kaat did pitch 44 of his 898 games in Yankees pinstripes, none as a starter, covering the back half of 1979 and the first month of the 1980 season, and amassing a 2-4 record and 4.12 ERA before they sold him off to the Cardinals.

Imagine the Dodgers trying to hijack Rickey Henderson’s Hall of Fame induction by giving him the same kind of “lifetime” contribution to their franchise for the 30 games he played at the end of 2003 — highlighted in our review of Howard Bryant’s new biography on Henderson.

Kaat, by the way, was also pushed into another head-scratching moment eight months ago when, last October, he apologized after saying teams should try to “get a 40-acre field full of” players who look like Chicago White Sox infielder Yoan Moncada. Ask Spike Lee for some context to that — the reference to how the U.S. government once promised freed slaves 40 acres and a mule following the Civil War.

It didn’t sound like Kaat was referring specifically to that, but … are we good now?

One more thing to consider: Is there anyone whose been voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame as a player and then won the Ford C. Frick Award honoring one’s work as a broadcaster?

Nope.

Could Kaat be the first? That could be the MLB EGOT.

Kaat, who studied speech and journalism while playing baseball at Hope College before signing with the Senators in 1957, has frequently been on first-draft Frick Award ballots that often get winnowed down to a final eight-or-10 names. In 2004, he was already being considered, having logged 17 years working for the Yankees, Braves and Twins, plus his time with CBS, ABC, ESPN and The Baseball Network.

Of the 340 members now enshired in the Baseball Hall of Fame after today’s ceremonies — that includes players, managers, umpire, executive, owners and contributors — the ones who’d have strongest consideration to also get a Frick Award might be Richie Ashburn, Bert Blyleven, Lou Boudreau, Dizzy Dean, Don Drysdale, Harry Heilmann, Ralph Kiner, Joe Morgan, Jim Palmer, Pee Wee Reese, Phil Rizzuto and Don Sutton.

Perhaps John Smoltz or Pedro Martinez, if there is a length of time involved in their mike careers.

One could make a case for Blyleven, Boudreau, Rizzuto and Reese not even deserving of getting in as a player, but had the benefit of a broadcasting career keeping their names in circulation for voters. Dean barely logged in the necessary 10 years required for Hall of Fame induction as a player and compiled just 150 wins mostly from 1932 to ’41, but that included a stretch of 18, 20, 30, 28 and 24 – very Koufaxian. Then came the 1937 All-Star game injury and a spiral. Dean got into the Hall as a player in ’53, staying in the public eye as a colorful broadcaster for the Cardinals and Browns of St. Louis, then the Yankees, followed by national broadcasters Mutural Radio, ABC and CBS through 1965. Dean was among the finalists for the Frick Award in 2021, ’17, ’16, ’15, ’10, ’07, 06, ’05 … at some point, someone figured he’d just get in by voter exhaustion.

Drysdale was also a Frick finalist in ’21 (won by Al Michaels) and ’17 (won by Bob Costas). Morgan and Reese were also a finalist in ’17. Heilmann, elected as a player in 1952 after 19 years primarily with the Detroit Tigers and Cincinnati Reds (1913-32), was the Tigers’ radio voice from 1934-1950. He was on the Frick ballots in 2019, ’16 and ’15. Ashburn and Kiner were among the 10 candidates for the Frick in ‘15.

After the first Frick award was given in ’78, seven former players won it — Jerry Coleman, Jack Graney, Joe Garagiola, Bob Uecker, Tony Kubek, Tim McCarver and Ken Harrelson. But none were really in Hall of Fame player discussion. Graney, after 14 years as an outfielder with Cleveland, was the first former big leaguer to broadcast a game, and he did it for 22 years, as a pioneer on the medium.

Something to think about … And to begin preparing to happen for Kaat’s sake, and his stake in the game.

You can look it up: More to ponder

== While we’re in this Hall of Fame moment, consider a pre-order on “Baseball Memories and Dreams: Reflections on the National Pastime from the Baseball Hall of Fame” (National Baseball Hall of Fame Books, $29.95, 265 pages, due out Oct. 4, 2022). It is said to be “recollections of Hall of Famers and narratives from top baseball writers” picked up from the Baseball Hall of Fame’s member magazine, “Baseball Memories & Dreams.” Included are postings by Johnny Bench, Peter Gammons, John Grisham, Tim Kurkjian, Ichiro Suzuki and Joe Torre.

== Kaat talks about his book on SportsBylineUSA.com.

== The Holland (Mich.) Sentinel excerpts all the Kaat material about him growing up in Zeeland, Mich., a town today with a population of about 5,000, near Lake Michigan just southwest of Grand Rapids. Kaat dedicated his first book to his father, John Kaat, who worked at the local Dutch turkey hatchery but “known as ‘Mr. Baseball’ in Zeeland and who took Jim to his first game at Briggs Stadium in 1946.

== One other previous Kaat-scratched-out book for Triumph: The 2015 “If These Walls Could Talk: New York Yankees,” with Greg Jennings. Also, in April 2023, a paperback of “Good As Gold” is scheduled to be released for $18.95, perhaps with a reflection of his Hall of Fame induction experience as the new intro.

== More books by co-author and SABR member Douglas Lyons include “100 Years of Who’s Who in Baseball” (Lyons Press, 2015); “Can You Believe It?: 30 Years of Insider Stories with the Boston Red Sox,” (with Joe Castiglione, Triumph Books, 2012),” “Out of Left Field, Short Hops and Foul Tips: 1,734 Wild and Wacky Baseball Facts,” (with brother and famous movie critic Jeffrey Lyons, Taylor Trade Publishing, 2005), “Catching Heat: The Jim Leyritz Story,” (co-authored with Leyritz and brother Jeffrey Lyons, HCI, 2011), “Curveballs and Screwballs: Over 1,286 Incredible Baseball Facts, Finds, Flukes, and More!” (with brother Jeffrey, Random House, 2001), and “From an Orphan to a King: Eddie Feigner” (with the famous softball star Feigner, Immortal Investments Publishing, 2004).

Day 31 of 2022 baseball books: Shenanigans, again and again, and the doctrines that go with ’em

“Intentional Balk: Baseball’s Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating”

The authors:
Daniel R. Levitt
Mark Armour

The publishing info:
Clyde Hill Publishing
258 pages
$22
Released July 12, 2022

The links:
The publishers website
The book’s official website
At Mark Armour’s website
At Daniel Levitt’s website
At Bookshop.org
At Indiebound.org
At SkylightBooks.com
At DieselBookstore.com
At Powells.com; at Vromans.com; at TheLastBookStoreLA; at PagesABookstore.com
At Amazon.com; at BarnesAndNoble.com

The review in 90 feet or less

A Dodgers’ ball girl removes an inflatable trash can thrown onto the field as she runs behind Houston Astros right fielder Michael Brantley during the first inning of the Astros-Dodgers game Aug. 3, 2021 at Dodger Stadium. Many in the crowd of 52,692, the largest attendance at a game that season, jeered Astros players, feeling they had been cheated out of the 2017 World Series title. A half-dozen inflatable trash cans got tossed on the field, a reference to the Astros’ banging on real trash cans to signal opponents’ pitchers in their scam. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

Consider the headline in the Washington Post last April: “Cheating Is Part of Baseball, Says MLB. A Federal Court Agrees.”

Say it ain’t so, Jose Altuve.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had just rejected a lawsuit by fans who were already duped into thinking they’d make money with the fantasy baseball website DraftKings.com, but now claimed their betting results were compromised by a couple of illegal sign-stealing scandals that happened between 2017 and 2019.

A fan holds a sign during a spring training baseball game between the Houston Astros and the Washington Nationals in February, 2020 in West Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

The plaintiffs, who meticulously built their faux teams with real players and lived and died on the points they gained based on those real players’ performances, claimed they were protected by the MLB’s plausibility that all games would be played fairly. That didn’t happen. A league investigation found the Houston Astros and the Boston Red Sox violated rules that bar stealing signs via electronic means. In the DraftKings’ fans eyes, that meant their player performances were skewed by inaccurate fantasy stats.

If only this was a victim-less crime.

The court wasn’t asked to decide whether cheating actually occurred. Or whether the MLB misrepresented its product. Or if the plaintiffs relied on the MLB’s credibility. The question was whether all of these claims, if proved, would give rise to liability.

It did not, the MLB insisted in its defense. The judges agreed. They said: “(A)ny reasonable spectator or consumer of sports competitions — including participants in fantasy sports contests based upon such sporting events — is undoubtedly aware that cheating is, unfortunately, part of sports and is one of many unknown variables that can affect player performance and statistics on any given day, and over time.”

The court of public opinion may disagree. But that’s the deal, bro. Go have a fantasy parade for your team now.

Somewhere in his home at Vero Beach, Fla., Fay Vincent’s head exploded. That incident has yet to be updated on the Wikipedia page: “Cheating in Baseball.”

In 2002, Fay Vincent wrote this book for Simon & Schuster.

Vincent, a former entertainment lawyer, securities regulator and business executive who became the accidental MLB commissioner following the passing of Bart Giamatti in 1989, bared his baseball soul in a 2013 interview with America magazine, an intellectual weekly publication by Catholic Jesuits about faith and culture. The church of baseball is always in their crosshairs.

In 2010, Fay Vincent wrote this book for Simon & Schuster.

On the subject of the morality of baseball, Vincent was asked to expand on an op-ed piece he had done published in the Wall Street Journal that gave him real estate to talk about what he would have done with players who were caught using performance-enhancing drugs. That headline read: “Tell the Baseball Druggies: Strike Out, You’re Out.”

For American magazine, according to a transcript of the interview, Vincent laid it out there about the sport’s seemingly acceptance of various shades of defrauding, deception and dishonesty:

I think all cheating is dangerous and pernicious … I think one of the problems with sports, especially with baseball, is we sort of smiled at spitballs, tinkering with bats. Those seemed to us to be innocent forms of cheating. But it’s like saying we’re going to permit a little cheating on your income tax. I mean if you cheat, you cheat and I think this kind of performance enhancing drugs is a major form of cheating. It’s also illegal. It’s violative of the prohibited substance act. The federal statute says: You can’t be using these drugs without a prescription, you can’t be selling them in any event. I think one of the problems with baseball has been that we’ve been too tolerant of what we call innocent forms of cheating. There is no such thing as innocent cheating.”

Vincent’s run as commissioner was brief, ending in 1992 when some baseball owners decided he was too much a threat to their business and could have someone like future Hall of Fame inductee and Milwaukee Brewers owner Bud Selig there instead to watch out for them with a strike/walkout looming.

America editor in chief George W. Hunt was moved to address the situation that sent Vincent away from his lofty post: “Ever since that bite of the tasty fruit, the way of the world has been that third-raters conspire to denigrate or oust first-raters in their midst. ’Twas ever so in playgrounds, factories, boardrooms, even churches, since the same Tree of Knowledge feeds the appetites of ignorance and stupidity as well. This sad tale was retold again recently when a handful of dissident owners, alarmed at integrity and intelligence, persuaded some straddlers to vote ‘no confidence’ in the Commissioner of Major League Baseball, Mr. Fay Vincent Jr. The vote was 18-9, with one abstention, requesting his resignation. Mr. Vincent originally intended to contest this dubious decision and fight to the end. Fortunately, he changed his mind, and his leave-taking was as dignified and forthright as his conduct in office has been.”

In this new book about the history of how the game has managed to survive despite those who find gray areas to manipulate in its credibility, SABR stalwarts and unimpeachable historians Daniel R. Levitt and Mark Armour aren’t demanding a call to action that pushes current commissioner Rob Manfred to do a better job cleaning up the sport from its cheating past, present and likely future.

Whatever you think of his performance since he took over in from Vincent’s predecessor, Bud Selig, in 2015, Manfred has already seen plenty of pushback from how he handled the Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scandal — doing his best to appease the owners by punishing team GMs and managers involved – but not players – in the wake of a longer investigation.

He says he has the best interest of the game’s future – mostly because sports wagering is becoming a business partner, and fans (see above) want guarantees about the game being conducted on the up and up. It is ultimately why you’ll someday soon see robotic umpires at home plate on balls and strike calls, and a likely expansion of replay to make sure everything is as close to perfect as possible.

Levitt and Armour, as MLB historian John Thorn writes in an endorsement of the book, “may raise an eyebrow at this infraction or that one, but they are not moralists. For them, play is serious fun, and so is their book.”

We start there because, if you’re looking for a revolutionary chapter after chapter of essays damning the game and throwing intense shade on those who’ve failed to do something about it, that’s not the point. Instead, it’s something much more entertaining, educational and enlightening.

Continue reading “Day 31 of 2022 baseball books: Shenanigans, again and again, and the doctrines that go with ’em” →

Day 30 of 2022 baseball books: Looking an MLB Draft horse in the mouth (and look up draft horse, it’s a real thing)

“Feeling a Draft: Baseball Scouting
And the first 50 Years of the Amateur Player Draft”

The authors:
Fred Day
Ray McKenna

The publishing info:
Self published/
iUniverse Publishing
408 pages
$33.99
Released Nov. 18, 2021

The links:
The publishers website
The authors website
At Bookshop.org
At Indiebound.org
At Powells.com
At Vromans.com
At TheLastBookStoreLA
At PagesABookstore.com
At SkylightBooks.com
At DieselBooks.com
At Amazon.com
At Barnes & Noble.com

The review in 90 feet or less

So what do you hear about “The Hispanic Titanic?”

It’s a person, not a place or thing.

And it could be a really big thing someday.

Perhaps you can become one of his OG fanatics.

So we’re watching the MLB Network last Sunday morning, and up comes an interesting segment about hitting mechanics. The subject is Ivan Melendez, a 6-foot-3, 225-pound, Jose Canseco-looking first baseman from the University of Texas. He just won the Golden Spikes Award in 2022 as college baseball’s best player – .387 average, school-record 32 home runs, 94 RBIs for the Longhorns, who returned to the College World Series.

The show about getting to “The Show” was another in a series related to the upcoming 2022 MLB Draft — the first round starts July 17, this year held in the LA Live plaza for the first time, as another element of the All-Star Game festivities in Southern California. (ESPN will also cover the first round on that Sunday at 4 p.m. in place of an MLB game). The draft doesn’t end until two days later.

So, no, you didn’t miss that MLB draft that usually comes in early June during the College World Series. Starting last year, it was pushed back (despite the wishes of teams who lose a month’s worth of time in development) to make it all more … Compelling? Convenient? Consolidated with the All-Star Game stretch that has actual life-affecting news attached to it.

In the order of picking for 2022, the Angels have the 13th choice overall. The Dodgers would have had No. 30, but — after these sandwich rounds for compensatory picks to help teams that lost free agents players, and a “competitive balance” round where small-market teams get some extra juice — they had to forfeit 10 picks and now, at No. 40 to start the official second round, this is payback for “exceeding the competitive balance tax threshold.”

This 2022 Dodgers lineup valued at $261,273,489 (with $35,333,333 in suspended animation) is your tax dollars at work.

Continue reading “Day 30 of 2022 baseball books: Looking an MLB Draft horse in the mouth (and look up draft horse, it’s a real thing)” →

Day 29 of 2022 baseball books: When Murphy’s Law in Chicago meant there was no wrong way to run the Cubs

“Charlie Murphy: The Iconoclastic Showman
Behind the Chicago Cubs”

The author:
Jason Cannon

The publishing info:
University of Nebraska Press
400 pages
$36.95
Released June 1, 2022

The links:
The publishers website
At Bookshop.org
At Indiebound.org
At Powells.com
At Vromans.com
At TheLastBookStoreLA
At Skylight Books
At Diesel Books
At PagesABookstore.com
At Amazon.com
At BarnesAndNoble.com

The review in 90 feet or less

Murphy’s Bleachers, the human circus with the green awning holding down the corner of Waveland and Sheffield, is among the must-observe places in Chicago’s Wrigleyfield when soaking up the neighborhood vibe before a Cubs’ game. Perhaps even break through the fence and order a beer if time allows.

From the center-field bleachers at Wrigley Field, you can look down upon it, but don’t look down on it. You find yourself asking: What I am doing up here if all those folks are jammed into that brick-building patio below seem to be having so much fun?

It started as a hot-dog-and-beer stand in the 1930s right after prohibition. It became Ray’s Bleachers in ’65. It was sold to a Chicago police detective named Jim Murphy in 1980, and his family has taken care of it ever since (his name is even officially posted on the street corner sign).

Charles Webb Murphy, the pre-Wrigley caretaker of the Cubs franchise from 1906 until he was forced out in 1913, doesn’t seem to have any familial roots to the place. Too bad. That would make it all the more historic and hysterical.

So let’s pretend anyway.

“You don’t know the history of the Chicago Cubs until you know the story of” this “ebullient and mercurial owner” of the franchise that, under his watch, won four National League pennants plus the 1907 and ’08 World Series titles — then went into championship hibernation for about 108 years.

The book-jacket blurb to encourage picking up this heavy-duty biography also wishes you to know this gentleman with the bowler cap, sporty mustache and holding a cigar on the cover has also been labeled as, in no particular order: Impetuous, lucky, sharp, lovable and loathable. Full of brash, bluster and hustle with explosions of creativity. Act first, apologize later.

“Hate him or love him, he is always interesting, and that is something,” said his longtime friend and sportswriter Hugh Fullerton, the famous whistle blower in the Black Sox Scandal (played by Studs Terkel in the 1988 movie, “Eight Men Out.”

He’d also refer to “Murph” as someone whose “spectacular success, and his brilliant showmanship naturally made enemies, especially of other club owners. He out-witted them, out-traded them and out-talked them.”

Continue reading “Day 29 of 2022 baseball books: When Murphy’s Law in Chicago meant there was no wrong way to run the Cubs” →

Day 28 of 2022 baseball books: How Ron Shelton put us in the pews with ‘Bull Durham’

“The Church of Baseball: The Making of ‘Bull Durham’:
Home Runs, Bad Calls, Crazy Fights, Big Swings and a Hit”

The author: Ron Shelton

The publishing info: Knopf/ Penguin/Random House; 256 pages; $30; Released July 5, 2022

The links: The publishers website; at Bookshop.org; at Skylight Books; at Indiebound.org; at Powells.com; at Vromans.com; at TheLastBookStoreLA; at PagesABookstore.com; at Amazon.com; at BarnesAndNoble.com

The review in 90 feet or less

In the big inning …

If the church of baseball works as a metaphor for “Bull Durham” — and those who continue to gospel sing its praises nearly 35 years after its release into the world — it can work the other way around in real-time church talk.

In 2017, Dr. Jason Lief, a professor of biblical and theological studies at Northwestern Christian College in Iowa who got his Ph.D. from Luther Seminary, wrote an essay for ReformedJournal.com headlined “Strikeouts are Fascist: Crash Davis and the Body of Christ.”

Hang in there, it’ll make some sense.

Tom Verducci’s lamentations in Sports Illustrated about the state of Major League Baseball was this jumping off point. In light of specialization — the decrease of the number of balls put into play, and the action often reduced to walks, strike outs or home runs — baseball has become boring. The piece refers to a scene in “Bull Durham” when Crash Davis is exasperated with Nuke LaLoosh, calls time, goes to the mound, and blurts out one of 238 memorable lines (*or maybe just a Top 37) from the flick:

Relax, all right? Don’t try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they’re fascist. Throw some groundballs – it’s more democratic.”

Lief sees that as a burning bush moment.

“What makes baseball good and what makes baseball interesting is when it is a collection of players with different skills and abilities working together as a team. We can’t all be shortstops, and we can’t all pitch. We need the gritty little players who slap hit the ball to the opposite field to move a runner, and we need the big swinging lefty to get us back into the game …

“When baseball teams start following some universal pattern, and players start playing the same, looking the same, and sounding the same… well, we get bad baseball. Or, at least boring baseball.”

He ventures to book of Colossians, where Paul says in the New King James Version: “Where there is no longer Greek nor Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave nor free, but Christ is all, and in all!” (Colossians 3:11).

Lief reads into that as: “The church is a unified diversity, or maybe a better way to say it is a diverse unity … We need shortstops, left fielders, catchers, and pinch runners. We need different personalities — the clubhouse clown, the Crash Davis veteran, and the hotshot young pitcher with loads of directionless talent.

“The problem with the church is the same problem affecting baseball — we all want to be the same. We only want to worship with those think like us. We only want to hear the ‘truth’ of scripture that fits with the ‘truth’ as we see it. We don’t want to be bothered with the hard task of serious interpretation or discernment. We certainly don’t want to be bothered with the hard task living in real community, as opposed to the vague, overused, rhetoric that people mistake for community.

“When it comes to the social issues ready to rip our denominations and congregations apart, what if we stopped listening to the loudest, and often most ‘certain’ voices and started listening to the Crash Davises within our communities? What if our churches stopped worshiping at the cult of personality and become much more democratic, much more empathetic, and much more interesting?

“We need each other in all of our diversity and quirkiness. Maybe we need to start playing church (and I mean the word play in a philosophical sense, not a ‘let’s pretend’ sense), and stop talking about being the church.”

Amen and pass the hot dog relish.

With writer/director Ron Shelton’s incredibly insightful breakdown about how, why and what happened when “Bull Durham” came out in baseball’s spiritual summer of 1988 — it preceded the release of “Eight Men Out” and was one bookend of the Dodgers’ improbable World Series run – he often goes back to that church connection to explain, because that’s in his DNA.

He grew up with bible stories. He took required Old and New Testament courses at the Christian liberal arts Westmont College in Santa Barbara and found them to be “the most rigorous classes I’ve ever taken.”

But as a 12-year-old growing up in Santa Barbara, a baseball fan of local native Eddie Matthews and his Milwaukee Braves, when the team moved into in the 1957 World Series facing the New York Yankees, the “church thing” took on new revelations.

Updated in March 2020. Our review is here.

On a Sunday morning in October, after Shelton first attended church school and then went to services at First Baptist Church, his father suddenly took the family out of church to get home in time to meet the TV delivery man from Ott’s department store. A delivery on a Sunday? It was special order.

The black-and-white set came on to show the fourth game of the World Series, as the Braves were trailing two games to one, and prayers were needed.

From page 6: “We watched that game in terror, aware that Eddie was having a terrible series. But after the team tied it in the bottom of the tenth, our hometown hero hit a towering two-run homer to win the game. A great weight lifted up out of the room, my father looked around, his shoulders lightened and we started going to church less and less. The seed for the Church of Baseball was planted.”

The first lines of the movie that Shelton feeds Annie Savoy picks up on that:

Addie Beth Denton’s memoir: Texas Tech University Press, 192 pages out July 7, 2022

“I believe in the Church of Baseball. I’ve tried all the major religions, and most of the minor ones. I’ve worshiped Buddha, Allah, Brahma, Vishnu, Siva, trees, mushrooms, and Isadora Duncan. I know things. For instance, there are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary and there are 108 stitches in a baseball. When I learned that, I gave Jesus a chance. But it just didn’t work out between us. The Lord laid too much guilt on me. I prefer metaphysics to theology. You see, there’s no guilt in baseball, and it’s never boring … which makes it like sex.”

From 2019. Our review.

A true Catholic rosary may have just 59 beads – a Mala necklace Hindu prayer beads from India actually has 108 for many more celestial reasons. But the point is made.

The beauty of Shelton’s book is it continues to enlighten and entertain, not through tawdry details about misbehaving cast or crew, but connecting the far more intimate dots, looks at the impact of the film (finding out people have named their kids after some of the characters) and how the city of Durham still credits it for a revival.

It’s also a detailed TED talk about how movies are made, from budgets, shooting schedules, changing scripts and scenes, interwoven music, and what one fights for and gives up on with the bosses.

Continue reading “Day 28 of 2022 baseball books: How Ron Shelton put us in the pews with ‘Bull Durham’” →